Tunable superconductivity in parent cuprate Pr2CuOδ thin films
Wei Xinjian1, 2, He Ge1, 2, Hu Wei1, 2, Zhang Xu1, 2, Qin Mingyang1, 2, Yuan Jie1, 3, Zhu Beiyi1, Lin Yuan4, Jin Kui1, 2, 3, 5, †
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Guangdong 523808, China
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices & Center for Information in Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100190, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: kuijin@iphy.ac.cn

Project supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2015CB921000, 2016YFA0300301, 2017YFA0303003, and 2018YFB0704100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674374 and 11474338), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-SLH008), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grants Nos. XDB07020100 and XDB07030200), and the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. Z161100002116011).

Abstract
Abstract

We studied the role of oxygen in Pr2CuOδ thin films fabricated by the polymer assisted deposition method. The magnetoresistance and Hall resistivity of Pr2CuOδ samples were systematically investigated. It was found that with decreasing oxygen content, the low-temperature Hall coefficient (RH) and magnetoresistance changed from negative to positive, similar to those with the increase of Ce-doped concentration in CexCuO4 (R=La, Nd, Pr, Sm, Eu). In addition, we observed that the dependence of the superconducting critical temperature Tc with RH for the Pr2−xCexCuO4 perfectly overlapped with that of Pr2CuOδ. These findings point to the fact that the doped electrons induced by the oxygen removal are responsible for the superconductivity of the -phase parent compounds.

1. Introduction

Studying the parent compounds of high-Tc superconductors is crucial for unveiling the underlying mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity, as well as providing significant clues to explore new superconductors. Parent compounds of the cuprates have been long considered as antiferromagnetic Mott insulators, which can be tuned to superconductors by hole or electron doping.[1] For example, Sr2+ cation substitute La3+ cations in hole-doped La2−xSrxCuO4 or Ce4+ cation substitute R 3+ cations in electron-doped CexCuO4 (R=La, Nd, Pr, Sm, Eu).[2] Besides the Ce-doped concentration, superconductivity of the electron-doped cuprates depend heavily on the oxygen content. In 1995, the superconducting critical temperature of the under-doped Pr2−xCexCuO4 (PCCO) was enhanced with respect to that of the optimally doped compound when the sample was submitted to a protected annealing process.[3] In 2008, superconductivity was induced in parent thin films -R2CuO4 (R=Nd, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd) by low-temperature annealing under the high-vacuum environment.[4] This discovery seemingly challenged the commonly accepted model that high-Tc superconductivity results from doping extra carriers into Mott insulators.

The intrinsic physics of superconductivity in the parent compounds is still under debate. Optical conductivity measurements on Pr2CuOδ (PCO) thin films have disclosed that the AFM-correlated pseudogap is absent in this system, which indicates that the -phase parent cuprates are metallic and superconductivity develops at low temperature.[5] In fact, it is unavoidable that the presence of unwanted oxygen defects during the sample preparation in turn introduces extra carriers into the CuO2 planes and leads to superconductivity. Wei et al.[6] found that the superconducting -La2CuO4 thin film can be tuned into an insulator by substituting Sr2+ for La3+. They suggested that the -phase parent cuprates are Mott insulators, while the intrinsic defects, most likely oxygen vacancies, are the sources of the effective carriers in these materials. Moreover, dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) studies demonstrate that the parent compounds may be described as weakly correlated Slater insulators rather than the strongly correlated charge transfer insulators.[7,8] Electrical transport measurement is a common but powerful method to explore the intrinsic electronic state in various superconductors. Plenty of studies in CexCuO4 materials[913] support the idea that the negative magnetoresistance (MR) and nonlinear magnetic field dependence of Hall resistivity can be associated to the antiferromagnetic order, Fermi surface reconstruction, quantum phase transition, etc., which contributed to the understanding of the mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity. Regretfully, systematic electrical transport investigations have been seldom addressed in the parent system.

In this paper, we carried out systematical MR and Hall resistivity measurements on superconducting PCO thin films which were synthesized on SrTiO3 (STO) substrates by the polymer assisted deposition method. With the decrease of oxygen content, the low-temperature MR gradually changes from negative to positive. Meanwhile, the low-temperature Hall coefficient RH undergoes a sign reversal, suggesting that the dominant carriers change from electrons to holes. These behaviors are quite similar to those observed in CexCuO4 materials. Furthermore, a Tc versus RH plot for both PCCO and PCO samples shows a perfect overlap of the data points of the two compounds. Our results imply that the carriers induced by the oxygen removal benefit the superconductivity in the -phase parent cuprates.

2. Preparation and measurements

Until now, the superconducting parent compounds have been successfully synthesized by metal–organic decomposition (MOD)[4] and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) methods.[6,14,15] In general, it is hard to buy naphthenates of rare-earth elements used in MOD. On the other hand, MBE facilities are very expensive, and it is of low-efficiency during the thin film preparation. Therefore, developing a high-efficiency and inexpensive method for preparing superconducting parent thin films is of high technological relevance. Polymer assisted deposition (PAD) is a newly developed method, which has the advantages of easy operation, low cost, and stable precursor solutions.[16,17] In Fig. 1(a), a schematic diagram of PAD method is presented. In the first stage of the process, metal ions are electrostatically bound to the polymer in deionized water, forming a uniform and stable solution. Afterwards, the solution is applied onto a substrate through either spin-coating or dipping. Finally, the coated substrate is treated at a desired temperature in an oxygen-controlled environment to remove the polymer and enable the growth of the metal-oxide film.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of polymer assisted deposition method with metallic ions represented by red dots and polymeric chains by thick dark lines. Panels (b)–(d) show XRD 2θ-scans, ϕ-scan, and rocking curve of (006) diffraction peak of the Pr2CuOδ film on the SrTiO3 (001) substrate, respectively.

To prepare high-quality superconducting PCO thin films, the metal ion sources are Pr and Cu nitrates, and the organic compounds are polyethylenimine (PEI) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The concentration of Pr (Cu) metal ions in the solution was determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy measurement. Then the precursor solution was obtained by mixing Pr solution and Cu solution at a certain stoichiometric ratio. In order to avoid a Cu deficiency, we enriched Cu by 50% in the precursor solution. The precursor solution was spin coated on STO substrates. The polymer was pyrolyzed by heating gradually from room temperature to 550 °C in the air. After that, the samples were sintered and crystallized at 850 °C for one hour in a tubular furnace under 200 Pa oxygen pressure. Finally, the films were annealed in low-oxygen pressure of about 1 Pa at various temperatures. The film thickness measured by scanning electron microscope is about 60 nm.

To characterize the structure and crystallinity of the PCO thin films, we measured the , ϕ-scan, and rocking curve of (006) diffraction peak of the samples using x-ray diffractometer. The XRD -scan of the PCO film on STO (001) is shown in Fig. 1(b). All peaks are sharp and can be indexed to (00l) of the -structure, indicating that the film shows a single phase and c-axis orientation. Figure 1(c) exhibits a small full width at half maximum of the rocking curve of the (006) diffraction peak, meaning that the sample has a good epitaxy as also evidenced by the ϕ-scan data with the approximately equal peak intensities in Fig. 1(d). Subsequently, electrical transport properties were measured in a 9 T physical property measurement system. In order to improve the measurement accuracy, all samples were patterned into standard Hall bridge structures. The magnetic field was applied perpendicular to the film surface during the MR and Hall resistivity measurements.

3. Results and discussion

In Fig. 2, we present the temperature dependence of the resistivity for various PCO thin films. With the decrease of the temperature, the resistivity of US3, US21, and US19 samples shows an upturn at the temperature Tmin. Considering that c0 should have a positive correlation with the relative oxygen content of the samples,[18] we calculated the c-axis lattice constants c0 of PCO films (see Table 1) by Bragg diffraction formula , where , λ(Cu , and n = 8 if we set 2θ to be the angle of (008) peak. It is worth mentioning that Tmin gradually decreases as c0 reduces and the upturn behavior disappears for S22, S19, S11, and S3.

Fig. 2. Resistivity as a function of temperature for Pr2CuOδ films with various oxygen contents. (a) The resistivity of the samples US3, US19, and US21 shows an upturn at the temperature defined as Tmin. (b) The resistivity versus temperature of S22, S19, S11, and S3 samples shows a good metallic behavior. The number in the sample label presents the superconducting transition temperature.

In the underdoped region of Ce-doped cuprates, the low-temperature resistivity also shows an AFM-induced upturn, which gradually disappears with the increase of Ce concentration.[11,19] High magnetic field can suppress this upturn behavior, resulting in a negative MR.[13] Figure 3 displays the field dependence of MR, with the applied field parallel to the c-axis . The MRs of US3, US21, and US19 samples are negative at the low temperature and turn into positive at the high temperature as shown in Figs. 3(a)3(c). We define the transition temperature as T0, which has a consistent tendency with Tmin (as shown in Table 1). Besides, the low-temperature negative MR fades away with reducing oxygen content (Fig. 3(d)). We conclude that the mechanisms of the upturn and negative MR in US3, US21, and US19 samples are related to the antiferromagnetic order the same as those in the under-doped region of Ce-doped cuprates and the AFM can be erased just by the oxygen removal.

Fig. 3. (a)–(c) MR versus magnetic field B for US3, US19, and US21, respectively. (d) MR curves for various Pr2CuOδ films at T = 30 K.
Table 1.

Summary of the transport properties and lattice structure constant c0 of PCO films. Tc is the superconducting transition temperature at which the resistance becomes a half of the normal state value. T0 represents the transition temperature of MR from negative to positive of US3, US21, and US19 samples. RRR is the resistance ratio of R(300 K)/R(30 K) and c0 is the c-axis lattice constant.

.

The Hall coefficient RH can illuminate the nature of material carriers. For example, the low-temperature RH in the CexCuO4 system varies from negative to positive as the Ce-doped concentration increases, corresponding to the carriers varying from electrons to holes.[9,12,20] Figure 4(a) exhibits RH as a function of temperature for various samples. The RHs of US3, US19, and US21 are negative in the whole temperature range, suggesting that the electron is predominant in the transport process. The sign reversal of RH arises in S22 and S19 as the temperature increases, i.e., from positive to negative, which reveals a competition between electron and hole carriers. The RHs of S11 and S3 are positive below 150 K, indicating that the dominant carriers are holes.

Fig. 4. (a) Normal state Hall coefficient RH versus temperature for Pr2CuOδ films measured at B = 9 T . (b)–(d) Hall resistivity versus B for S3, S22, US3.

Figure 4(b)4(d) display the Hall resistivity at various temperatures for US3, S22, and S3, respectively. For US3 and S3, the as a function of magnetic field exhibits a good linear behavior, indicating that the samples have a single band characteristic. The low-temperature of the S22 sample is nonlinear to the magnetic field, which implies the coexistence of electron and hole bands. For Ce-doped cuprates, Fermi surface of the optimum doped samples is reconstructed by antiferromagnetic order.[12,21,22] Therefore, we can surmise that Fermi surface of the parent compounds can be gradually adjusted by changing the oxygen content.

As mentioned above, it can be concluded that, for MR and Hall resistivity, the effects of varying oxygen content in PCO thin films are similar to those of varying Ce concentration in PCCO. Such phenomenon indicates that the oxygen removal can induce carrier doping. This finding seemingly supports the scenario that superconductivity in parent compounds is obtained via doping a Mott insulator, symmetric to the hole-doped side. We note that this view has been clarified in the recent angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) results as well.[6,23]

Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to measure the accurate oxygen content which also plays a non-ignorable role in CexCuO4. Song et al.[24] studied Pr1−xLaCexCuO4 samples with different Ce concentrations and annealing processes using ARPES. They found that the effective electron number estimated from Fermi surface volume could unify the effect of Ce doping and deoxygenation. For electrical transports, RH is the most qualified quantity reflecting the information of carriers. Therefore, we try to set RH as the horizontal axis to study the evolution of Tc in both PCCO and PCO systems. As shown in Fig. 5, we find that all the data from distinct groups, various measuring conditions, and different samples obey the same rule, i.e., Tc increases at first and then decreases as RH increases. Especially, Tc always reaches its maximum near RH = 0, which indicates that the balance between the electron and hole bands is beneficial to the superconductivity of electron-doped cuprates, consistent with the electrostatic tuning results of Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4.[25]

Fig. 5. Tc versus RH of both PCO and PCCO. PCCO (2 K, 9 T) and PCCO (340 mK, 14 T) data derive from Refs. [12] and [20], respectively. The solid curve is a guide to the eye.

For the underdoped PCCO samples, the RH rapidly decreases as the temperature decreases, independent of the magnetic field.[12,26] Therefore, the clear difference between two groups of data of PCCO is mainly attributed to the temperature distinction. However, we cannot exclude the influence of antiferromagnetic order and disorder. The PCCO data show a perfect overlap in the overdoped region because the RH is hardly dependent on the temperature and linear with magnetic filed in this region. As shown in Fig. 5, we can see that the Tc of PCO is always greater than that of PCCO samples at a fixed RH value. This can be well explained by the fact that the disorder introduced by Ce doping is more than that by deoxygenation.[3] Furthermore, for the two-dimensional disordered system, the disorder-induced changes in Hall coefficient should be proportional to the correction to resistivity, i.e., .[27] However, one can see from Figs. 2 and 4(a) that the changes in Hall coefficient induced by oxygen removal are independent of those in resistivity. Besides, the RRR of S11 as listed in Table 1 is greater than that of S19, indicating that there are less disorders in S11 samples. Therefore, the Tc reduction should not result from the disorder effect. This finding can explain why Tc in the parent compounds are even higher than those of the optimal Ce-doped samples[18] and also support that the superconductivity in -phase parent cuprates stems from doping effect induced by the oxygen removal.

4. Conclusion

In summary, a series of high-quality superconducting PCO thin films have been prepared by polymer assisted deposition method. The magnetoresistance and Hall effect of superconducting PCO thin films with various oxygen contents are systematically studied. It is found that for the magnetoresistance and Hall resistivity, the effect of oxygen removal in PCO is similar to that of the Ce doping in CexCuO4. In addition, we find that Hall coefficient RH is an efficient parameter to depict the evolution of Tc in the electron-doped cuprates. We argue that doped electrons induced by the oxygen removal are the cause of the superconductivity in -parent compounds.

Reference
[1] Lee P A Nagaosa N Wen X G 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 17
[2] Armitage N P Fournier P Greene R L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2421
[3] Brinkmann M Rex T Bach H Westerholt K 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 4927
[4] Matsumoto O Utsuki A Tsukada A Yamamoto H Manabe T Naito M 2008 Physica 468 1148
[5] Chanda G Lobo R P S M Schachinger E Wosnitza J Naito M Pronin A V 2014 Phy. Rev. 90 024503
[6] Wei H I Adamo C Nowadnick E A Lochocki E B Chatterjee S Ruf J P Beasley M R Schlom D G Shen K M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 147002
[7] Weber C Haule K Kotliar G 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 574
[8] Weber C Haule K Kotliar G 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 125107
[9] Jin K Zhang X H Bach P Greene R L 2009 Phys. Rev. 80 012501
[10] Jin K Butch N P Kirshenbaum K Paglione J Greene R L 2011 Nature 476 73
[11] Dagan Y Barr M C Fisher W M Beck R Dhakal T Biswas A Greene R L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 057005
[12] Dagan Y Qazilbash M M Hill C P Kulkarni V N Greene R L 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 167001
[13] Zhang X Yu H S He G Hu W Yuan J Zhu B Y Jin K 2016 Physica 525 18
[14] Yamamoto H Matsumoto O Tsukada A Naito M 2010 Physica 470 1025
[15] Yamamoto H Matsumoto O Krockenberger Y Yamagami K Naito M 2011 Solid State Commun. 151 771
[16] Jia Q X McCleskey T M Burrell A K Lin Y Collis G E Wang H Li A D Foltyn S R 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 529
[17] Burrell A K McCleskey T Mark Jia Q X 2008 Chem. Commun.(Camb.) 11 1271
[18] Matsumoto O Utsuki A Tsukada A Yamamoto H Manabe T Naito M 2009 Phys. Rev. 79 100508
[19] Finkelman S Sachs M Droulers G Butch N P Paglione J Bach P Greene R L Dagan Y 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 094508
[20] Charpentier S Roberge G Godin-Proulx S Bechamp-Laganiere X Truong K D Fournier P Rauwel P 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 104509
[21] Lin J Millis A J 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 214506
[22] Sarkar T Mandal P R Higgins J S Zhao Y Yu H Jin K Greene R L 2017 Phys. Rev. 96 155449
[23] Horio M Krockenberger Y Yamamoto K Yokoyama Y Takubo K Hirata Y Sakamoto S Koshiishi K Yasui A Ikenaga E Shin S Yamamoto H Wadati H Fujimori A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 257001
[24] Song D Han G Kyung W Seo J Cho S Kim B S Arita M Shimada K Namatame H Taniguchi M Yoshida Y Eisaki H Park S R Kim C 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 137001
[25] Jin K Hu W Zhu B Kim D Yuan J Sun Y Xiang T Fuhrer M S Takeuchi I Greene R L 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 26642
[26] Li P Balakirev F F Greene R L 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 047003
[27] Altshuler B L Aronov A G Lee P A 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 1288